Menu

Beedie School of Business News

The following article was authored by Associate Professor Peter Tingling, and published by The Jakarta Post on June 23, 2012.

You work for an organization that has grown steadily by getting the fundamentals right — hiring and developing good people, instilling a strong work ethic, conducting solid analysis, and making smart choices.

Yet, despite these efforts, your company is struggling to make ends meet. The economy has faltered, your reserves are dwindling, and your biggest clients are scaling back.

Keep reading…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


The Beedie School of Business at Simon Fraser University is pleased to announce that it has been awarded SSHRD Insight Development Grant (IDG) funding for four separate business research initiatives – projects that will bring new understanding and knowledge to the areas of social innovation, capital markets, sustainability and business ethics.

They include research focused on liquidity and market efficiency in Canada conducted by Assistant Professor Karel Hrazdil and Professor Dennis Chung, and a project by Associate Professor Sudheer Gupta focused on inclusive economic development and poverty alleviation. Keep reading…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


In the wake of the announcement from Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi that he will be stepping down from his post, recent Beedie School of Business research points to his exploits as having a major impact on the image and reputation of his country.

As national brands go, it has historically been hard to beat that of Italy’s. The country is renowned for its rich cultural life, one that attracts tourists, investors and migrants from around the world every year. However, the recent research shows that this coveted national brand may be in decline because of the actions of its most prominent politician – a lesson that other countries should take heed of.

The study from Beedie PhD marketing student Kirk Plangger shows how a country’s brand — which government marketers pour millions of dollars into annually — can be negatively impacted by the actions of its national politicians.

The study was published in the August issue of Journal of Public Affairs.

Plangger examined the freefall of Italy’s national brand in the past five years in the context of the exploits of longstanding Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and the political cartoons that have skewered him in the wake of a number of political scandals that have beset his time in office.

According to the study, “a national-branding strategy is grounded in the vision of political leaders, especially the head of government or state. As the Italian case has shown, the political and even social actions of government leaders can have significant effects on the perceived national brand equity.”

Plangger authored the study with Alessandro Bigi (Lulea University of Technology, Sweden), Michelle Bonera (Universita degli studi di Brescia, Italy) and Colin Campbell (Monash University, Australia). He notes that the cartoons examined were a reflection of a much-broader response to his troubles in political office. “They are evidence of international sentiment against him,” said Plangger.

“There has been so much negative press around him, so we wanted to look at what this might be doing to Italy’s brand,” said Plangger. “We felt that his impact on Italy’s national brand was significant.”

The researchers note that Italy had the world’s top-rated brand in 2005, as ranked by the annual Country Brand Index that is published by FutureBrand. The nation has since dropped out of the Top 10 countries, to number 12.

“Political leaders attract more media attention than business, export brands, or tourism, because of the immediate implications of what they say or do,” notes the study. “Therefore, political leaders expose their countries to global audiences and promote travel or investment in their respective nation.”

More: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.403/full

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Aidan Vining, a professor of business and government relations at SFU’s Beedie School of Business, was selected as one of two finalists for the 2010 Kenneth J. Arrow Prize for Senior Economists this past May.

His paper, “An Assessment of Important Issues Concerning the Application of Benefit-Cost Analysis to Social Policy,” was co-authored with David Weimer, a professor of public affairs and political science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Annually, the Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) honours the very best work published in its economics journals. The Arrow Prize is the highest honor bepress bestows, and the nomination puts the researchers in an elite group of scholars.

Professor Vining is the Centre for North American Business Studies (CNABS) Professor of Business and Government Relations at Simon Fraser University. He has been at SFU’s business school since 1984. He has also held a number of administrative positions, including Academic Director of the Executive MBA.

He researches in the areas of public policy, policy analysis and business strategy. His current public policy research focuses primarily on privatization, corporatization, contracting-out and public-private partnerships. His recent research in business has focused on high-tech clusters and the role of internal markets.

The Arrow Prizes for Junior and Senior Economists are named in honor of Kenneth J. Arrow, who won the Nobel Prize in 1972 for his pioneering contributions to general equilibrium theory and welfare theory. Begun in 2003, the Arrow Prizes recognize papers published each year in bepress economics journals that make an outstanding contribution to the field.

A condensed version of Vining and Weimer’s research can be viewed at the La Follette Policy Report.

Tags: , ,


News Search
News Archives